Pope shakes up the world/Paus zet puntjes op de i in de VS


De toespraak van Paus Franciscus in het Amerikaans Parlement/Congres.

Mijn ‘notes’ zie je tussen de speech door’

On climate change: “I call for a courageous and responsible effort to redirect our steps and to avert the most serious effects of the environmental deterioration caused by human activity. I am convinced that we can make a difference and I have no doubt that the United States—and this Congress—have an important role to play. Now is the time for courageous actions and strategies, aimed at implementing a culture of care and an integrated approach to combating poverty, restoring dignity to the excluded, and at the same time protecting nature.” (Democrats stood to applaud the pope’s remarks on climate change, while many Republicans remained seated. The pope’s message was more muted than his remarks on the issue Wednesday when he spoke at the White House.”

Ik haal hieruit dat hij voorstander is van de theorie van de Australische klimatologen die riepen dat de VN enorm blunderd. We zitten in een jura tijdperk waarbij de mens idd mee moet helpen echter elke 10.000 jaar veranderd het klimaat. Met of zonder Volkswagen diesel.

On abolishing the death penalty: “I am convinced that this way is the best, since every life is sacred, every human person is endowed with an inalienable dignity, and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of those convicted of crimes. Recently my brother bishops here in the United States renewed their call for the abolition of the death penalty. Not only do I support them, but I also offer encouragement to all those who are convinced that a just and necessary punishment must never exclude the dimension of hope and the goal of rehabilitation.”

Hoeta in het land van de doodstraf roepen afschaffen verdiend een nobelprijs.

On abortion: “The Golden Rule also reminds us of our responsibility to protect and defend human life at every stage of its development.” (This was his only direct reference to abortion in the speech.)

Je merk als je leest ” de goude regel WAS” er is dus bij hem ruimte voor uitzonderingen

On same-sex marriage: The closest he came to addressing same-sex marriage was in a passage about the importance of family. “I cannot hide my concern for the family, which is threatened, perhaps as never before, from within and without. “Fundamental relationships are being called into question, as is the very basis of marriage and the family. I can only reiterate the importance and, above all, the richness and the beauty of family life.” (This did not appear to be an explicit denouncement of marriage equality.)

Dit is de complete kanteling een nieuwe encykliel. De Paus is niet ANTI gay. Want hij zegt niet dat het niet mag enkel dat hij begrijpt dat er mensen zijn die zich zorgen maken.

On Iran and Cuba: “When countries which have been at odds resume the path of dialogue—a dialogue which may have been interrupted for the most legitimate of reasons—new opportunities open up for all. This has required, and requires, courage and daring, which is not the same as irresponsibility. A good political leader is one who, with the interests of all in mind, seizes the moment in a spirit of openness and pragmatism. A good political leader always opts to initiate processes rather than possessing spaces.”

Hier stelt hij uitdrukkelijk dat WE het Westen overdreven Irak maar even moesten democratiseren en Cuba moesten boycotten. Hij bezocht beide landen dit jaar. Irak moslimland haalde hem echter als held binnen. Hij predikt immers ‘ga de dialoog aan’ en Cuba zo lees ik het daarvan heeft hij de boycot nooit begrepen. Ik ook niet tis mijn huis mi casa en net als mam wil ik daar sterven waar mijn hart ligt. Ook benadrukt hij ‘nauwelijks’ analfabeten’ uitstekende gezondheidszorg en fantastische mensen.

On the refugee crisis: “Our world is facing a refugee crisis of a magnitude not seen since the Second World War. This presents us with great challenges and many hard decisions. On this continent, too, thousands of persons are led to travel north in search of a better life for themselves and for their loved ones, in search of greater opportunities. Is this not what we want for our own children? We must not be taken aback by their numbers, but rather view them as persons, seeing their faces and listening to their stories, trying to respond as best we can to their situation.”

De vluchtelingen anno nu. Noemt hij het grootste probleem van ontheemdheid sinds de 2de wereld oorlog. Je moet voorzichtig zijn. Eem hart tonen en gezamenlijk een passende oplossing vinden. Ook kaart hij aan ‘lege landen zonder bevolking’ kan ook niet. Een groot probleem vanwege onze plicht ze te helpen maar allemaal verplaatsen is NIET de oplossing.

On immigration: “We, the people of this continent, are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners. I say this to you as the son of immigrants, knowing that so many of you are also descended from immigrants…Nonetheless, when the stranger in our midst appeals to us, we must not repeat the sins and the errors of the past. We must resolve now to live as nobly and as justly as possible, as we educate new generations not to turn their back on our ‘neighbors’ and everything around us. Building a nation calls us to recognize that we must constantly relate to others, rejecting a mindset of hostility in order to adopt one of reciprocal solidarity, in a constant effort to do our best. I am confident that we can do this.”

Emigratie noemt hij een noodzakelijk iets om landen op te bouwen. Hij verwoord het prachtig.

On poverty: “I would encourage you to keep in mind all those people around us who are trapped in a cycle of poverty. They too need to be given hope. The fight against poverty and hunger must be fought constantly and on many fronts, especially in its causes. I know that many Americans today, as in the past, are working to deal with this problem.”

Armoede is voor hem de vraag aan jezelf. Ken je het? Dan weet je wat het is. Ken je niet? Verdiep je erin. We zijn verplicht elkaar te helpen.

On the arms trade: “Being at the service of dialogue and peace also means being truly determined to minimize and, in the long term, to end the many armed conflicts throughout our world. Here we have to ask ourselves: Why are deadly weapons being sold to those who plan to inflict untold suffering on individuals and society? Sadly, the answer, as we all know, is simply for money: money that is drenched in blood, often innocent blood. In the face of this shameful and culpable silence, it is our duty to confront the problem and to stop the arms trade.”

De Paus is pacifist wijlen Koninging Juliana zou hem bejubbeld hebben. Je hebt ze nodig ter verdediging maar de prijs is wel extreem hoog…

On religious fundamentalism: “We know that no religion is immune from forms of individual delusion or ideological extremism. This means that we must be especially attentive to every type of fundamentalism, whether religious or of any other kind. A delicate balance is required to combat violence perpetrated in the name of a religion, an ideology or an economic system, while also safeguarding religious freedom, intellectual freedom and individual freedoms. But there is another temptation which we must especially guard against: the simplistic reductionism which sees only good or evil; or, if you will, the righteous and sinners.”

Hier staat waarom deze Paus waarom mij wel kan bekoren. RESPECT VOOR ELKE RELIGIE. Wellicht dat Wilders op werkvakantie naar het Vaticaan moet of verplicht mee moet op reizen in de fiat 500.

Believe the pope is a miracle